MoltenThought Logo

4.30.2005

With Enemies Like These...

...we must be doing the right thing, says the inimitable Victor Davis Hanson:

The Egyptian autocracy may have received $57 billion in aggregate American aid over the last three decades. But that largess still does not prevent the Mubarak dynasty from damning indigenous democratic reformers by dubbing them American stooges. In differing ways, the Saudi royal family exhibits about the same level of antagonism toward the U.S. as do the Islamic fascists of al Qaeda — both deeply terrified by what is going on in Iraq. Mostly this animus arises because we are distancing ourselves from corrupt grandees, even as we have become despised as incendiary democratizers by the Islamists. Is that risky and dangerous? Yes. Bad? Hardly

At the U.N. it is said that a ruling hierarchy mistrusts the United States and that a culture of anti-Americanism has become endemic within the organization. No wonder — the Americans alone push for more facts about the Oil-for-Food scandal, question Kofi Annan's breaches of ethics, and want investigations about U.N. crimes in Africa. If we are mistrusted for caring about those thousands who are inhumanely treated by a supposedly humane organization, then why in the world should we wish to be liked by such a group?

2 Comments:

karen said...

Teflon, Every liberal I know says we went to war for oil. It seems that is backward thinking since many of the every other countries that didn't support the U.S. in defeating Saddam were trading illegally with Saddam, making big $$$$ off ... OIL!!!

10:14 AM  
Chris Tune said...

The liberal "mantra" of "It's all about Oil", ignores the fact that there are nations which would be easier to defeat and obtain oil from than Iraq.

Mexico has oil and is very near. . .any action could be conducted nearby and oil shipped via pipeline. . .

Venezuela deserves an "a**kicking" and is also fairly nearby. Shipping would only need to cross the Caribbean.

Nigeria has large reserves and is so disorderly and corrupt, we could probably simply "buy" the country. . .no war needed.

No. . .this war, despite the presence of oil in the nation, simply cannot be about oil in the short run.

There is a decent outlook for oil from Iraq in the long run, IF, and ONLY IF there is a relatively free Iraq in the future. Why would we seek such and elaborate "ruse" to obtain more oil. . .a venture of this sort would be fraught with far too many bizarre risks to appeal to businesspersons.

Rather, I believe that links between Iraq and various terroist incidents (particularly, as yet strong, but not unequivocally proven, links between Iraq and the Oklahoma City bombing) result in an obvious need to rein in Iraq. A similar situation seems to be developing in Iran. Only Syria seems to be backing down. . of those malfeasant nations in the immediate area. . .

I tend to believe that much of this apparent backing down, such as we see from Syria and Libya is just "show". I think the fundamentals of these nations is totalitarian regimes based upon a select group of political overlords.

Whatever you call it, the nations in this area needed a dose of freedom. The hope of freedom is beginning to galvanize other nations suffering similarly--take Lebannon.

Good luck Iraq. . .you will need it. . .but if you succeed, you will see a second dawning of a phenomenon you originated so long ago:

CIVILIZATION.

Chris Tune

1:53 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home