Acts of Commission, Sins of Omission
The Silbermann-Robb Commission, which was apparently NOT a 70s prog-rock supergroup, released its report on intelligence failures. Michael Ledeen has this analysis:
How about having an intelligence community made up of people who would actually like to see America win the War on Terror, for a start?
Might be a good template for cleaning out the Augean Stables of moral equivalence at Foggy Bottom, too.
All of which leads to two conclusions that the commission could not reach, even though, reading between the lines, it seems pretty clear they would have if they could have: First, there must be accountability, and this means that lots of people should be fired (and should have been fired long since, especially after 9/11). And second, that, instead of expanding personnel — as the president requested and Congress obliged after the terrorist attacks three and a half years ago, and as the president again requested and Congress again obliged following the dreadful recommendations of the 9/11 Commission just before last year’s elections — we should drastically reduce manpower, and then, if necessary, slowly rebuild.
If talent and accountability are indeed the crucial issues — and, to repeat, the great strength of the report is its recognition that these are the crux of the matter — then it is impossible to get a good intelligence community by shuffling the failed bureaucrats around in new configurations, and then providing them with lots of new bodies to badly train and educate. It is a guaranteed formula for worse intelligence because it produces more and more bad analysts and ineffective case officers. The intelligence community needs a big-time purge, not a brainless expansion accompanied by a monster reshuffle of boxes, connections, and interagency groups.
The commission couldn’t say these things, because they were not part of its mandate. Instead, they occasionally hint at these conclusions — I can’t imagine such a great talent as Larry Silberman (who should be sitting on the Supreme Court) submitting to total censorship on such an important matter — and probably raised the matter, verbally, when they briefed the top congressional and executive-branch officials.
How about having an intelligence community made up of people who would actually like to see America win the War on Terror, for a start?
Might be a good template for cleaning out the Augean Stables of moral equivalence at Foggy Bottom, too.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home