Why Did the Founders Bother Writing the Constitution?
After all, aged mediocrities like Justice Kennedy simply pencil in whatever they wish the Constitution to read whenever the spirit (and Geritol) moves them:
Now Kennedy and the other black-robed gibberers have decided that the proper role of the Supreme Court is not to interpret U.S. law through a Constitutional lens, but to align U.S. law with "enlightened" international law.
Not only must Bush win the judiciary battle, we must drive clowns like Reagan-appointed Kennedy from the bench in disgrace.
We are Americans, guardians and inheritors of the world's oldest and most stable republic. We need hew to no fad of law dreamed up by Brussels bureaucrats for the enhancement of their slimy grip on political power.
It does "lessen [the Court's] fidelity to the Constitution" when the Court gives the actions of foreign governments priority over the text of the Constitution, the laws enacted, in this case, by the legislatures of 20 states, and the clearly expressed preferences of the majority of Americans. With all due respect to the Court's majority, there is simply no coherent rationale for counting the "enlightened" opinion of foreign governments as a factor in Constitutional jurisprudence.
Now Kennedy and the other black-robed gibberers have decided that the proper role of the Supreme Court is not to interpret U.S. law through a Constitutional lens, but to align U.S. law with "enlightened" international law.
Not only must Bush win the judiciary battle, we must drive clowns like Reagan-appointed Kennedy from the bench in disgrace.
We are Americans, guardians and inheritors of the world's oldest and most stable republic. We need hew to no fad of law dreamed up by Brussels bureaucrats for the enhancement of their slimy grip on political power.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home